Subject: Re: df vs devices
To: None <>
From: None <>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 01/09/2006 20:49:52
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 02:23:03PM -0500, der Mouse wrote:
> It's not as if df would have to contain any significant fraction of the
> ffs code; I think all the necessary values are in the superblock
> itself, even.  (Filesystems for which no analogous statement is true
> would be prime candidates for leaving out of df, of course.)

Well, why don't you add it to the single program which has already all
kind of weired magic -- file? The logic in df is IMO just plainly wrong.