Subject: Re: df vs devices
To: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
From: Jason Thorpe <email@example.com>
Date: 01/09/2006 10:15:07
On Jan 9, 2006, at 9:43 AM, der Mouse wrote:
> (Sending to both tech-kern and tech-userlevel since I don't know which
> part contains the responsible change. Please feel free to trim the
> list when following up with stuff relevant to only one of the two.)
> Traditionally, on NetBSD (and on older BSDs), df on a disk device has
> shown space on the filesystem on that device, even if the device is
> mounted anywhere at the time.
> Doesn't work that way on 2.0; instead, it shows the space on the
> filesystem holding the special device file (typically /).
In the old days, df used to actually open the device and interpret
the UFS data structures to glean the free space. "Ick."
I consider the current behavior to be correct. Any other behavior
would require adding file system-specific knowledge to df for every
file system that works on NetBSD.
> Is this a bug (and thus worth sending-pr), a feature (??), an
> unfortunate side effect of something considered more important, or
> what? It's annoying to have to mount a filesystem just to find out
> much space is free on it.
> /~\ The ASCII der Mouse
> \ / Ribbon Campaign
> X Against HTML firstname.lastname@example.org
> / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B