Subject: Re: Detecting statvfs without autoconf
To: Hubert Feyrer <hubert@feyrer.de>
From: Jeff Rizzo <riz@NetBSD.org>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 01/06/2006 08:11:34
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enigB5F694088D77D8FC7D1E1D65
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jan 2006, Christoph Kaegi wrote:
>> So the statfs -> stavfs change went in at 299000900 ?
>
> No.
>
>
> 3) Reading that, you see that the change was not present with 200030000=

>    and went in with 200040000.
>
> Which is what I wrote in my original mail.
>

Yes, but PLEASE use the 299000900 test, as otherwise it won't do the
right thing for NetBSD 2.1, which does _NOT_ have statvfs, and which has
a NetBSD_Version of 201000000.

+j



--------------enigB5F694088D77D8FC7D1E1D65
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQCVAwUBQ76WurOuUtxCgar5AQNeMgP/b37Lm0EerTrzavITtCt0SxQXuPsIqaCq
rDtNvOHqQkDVNl1TELrzffQaIBMmaXRAnRKRcOutV1l7TzMuuWPoXdfVq+XZoXoR
8WvT0Utc5KErW0Kn5clotKgJUhuFUTqYRF2Nk63EtxGwyELf8VobduCuAJctojwZ
baMoaQmSSns=
=d/Py
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enigB5F694088D77D8FC7D1E1D65--