YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> your claim was "each patches being sent for review should
> contain documentation updates", wasn't it?
> 
> honestly, if it's a requirement, i tend not to send
> any patches for review. :-)

I believe Hubert said:

> It's generally a good thing to include documentation when sending patches
> for review/comments. Or how do you plan to get docs reviewed?

I am just a lowly user of this stuff, so perhaps my opinion does not 
carry as much weight as a commiter, but I can tell you one of the 
reasons why I keep using NetBSD is because of the documentation. 
Accurate, concise documentation is priceless. If you don't believe me, 
try using Fedora for a month...

Best Regards,
Jim DeLisle

-- 
Swell Software, Inc.
jdelisle@swellsoftware.com