Subject: Re: small wscons.conf enhancement
To: YAMAMOTO Takashi <email@example.com>
From: Jim DeLisle <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/13/2005 08:36:36
YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> your claim was "each patches being sent for review should
> contain documentation updates", wasn't it?
> honestly, if it's a requirement, i tend not to send
> any patches for review. :-)
I believe Hubert said:
> It's generally a good thing to include documentation when sending patches
> for review/comments. Or how do you plan to get docs reviewed?
I am just a lowly user of this stuff, so perhaps my opinion does not
carry as much weight as a commiter, but I can tell you one of the
reasons why I keep using NetBSD is because of the documentation.
Accurate, concise documentation is priceless. If you don't believe me,
try using Fedora for a month...
Swell Software, Inc.