Subject: Re: OpenSSL is not compatible with C++?
To: John Nemeth <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Pavel Cahyna <email@example.com>
Date: 09/20/2005 21:41:42
On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 01:03:03 -0700, John Nemeth wrote:
> On Jan 27, 9:33am, Martin Husemann wrote:
> } I seriously think all those prototypes/nested macros should be fixed to
> } include all the arguments, and then a patch be fed back to the openssl
> } folks (not that they have incorporated suggestions in the past - maybe we
> } should switch to something sane (TM))
> What alternatives are out there? I know about GnuTLS, but that
> comes with LGPL, so it probably isn't suitable for inclusion in the
> base system.
There is also NSS: