Subject: Re: port-xen/29887: sysctl kern.consdev coredumps
To: James Chacon <jmc@NetBSD.org>
From: Jason Thorpe <email@example.com>
Date: 06/21/2005 14:06:44
On Jun 21, 2005, at 1:53 PM, James Chacon wrote:
> i.e. we should now have printfEx for anything printf related the
> didn't cover...
In the NetBSD case, it could even be a weak symbol that points to
printf! By doing this, you are telling the implementation that you
are explicitly relying on extensions (how is the implementation to
know otherwise that you expect NULL to really mean "(null)"?).