der Mouse wrote:

>
>Yeah...except that that "solves" a lot more than this.  (The real
>problem, of course, is not just this one instance, but more generally
>the gcc maintainers assuming that semantics undefined by the standard
>have not been defined by any gcc target - like what our printf does, or
>at least used to do, with nil pointers, printing them as (null).)
>  
>
For what it's worth, it appears that Solaris has picked up this habit as 
well....

-- 
				--*greywolf;