On Tue, 7 Jun 2005 14:01:11 +0200 Peter Postma <email@example.com> wrote: > Why the rename from scan_ffs to scanffs? > This seems inconsistent with other utilities, at least fsck_ffs. I thought scanffs would be better, but maybe I was wrong... I'll use scan_ffs in the future for consistency with the OpenBSD source. Thanks.