Subject: Re: scan_ffs from OpenBSD ported and improved.
To: Peter Postma <peter@pointless.nl>
From: Juan RP <juan@xtrarom.org>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 06/11/2005 19:24:46 
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005 14:01:11 +0200
Peter Postma <peter@pointless.nl> wrote:

> Why the rename from scan_ffs to scanffs?
> This seems inconsistent with other utilities, at least fsck_ffs.

I thought scanffs would be better, but maybe I was wrong... I'll use
scan_ffs in the future for consistency with the OpenBSD source.

Thanks.