Subject: Re: PATCH: init(8) - multiuser under chroot
To: Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@Xtrmntr.org>
From: Jachym Holecek <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/07/2005 23:11:57
> > c/ my current setup makes it simpler to document the states that the
> > system can be in - helps when being validated for FIPS and common
> > criteria. Simple is good.
I'd just point out that the two approaches under discussion don't differ
in the number of states the system may get into, AFAICS.
> this is something i can agree with. althought i still think matt's
> design is superior, it has a head and a tail, while yours is just "run
> ahead and burn all the bridges behind us".
I don't like the "no way back" aspect either (I understand it may
be OK for Simon's needs, it is however not for mine and Lubomir's
Anyway, I'll post a fix for getttyent() API and updated init diff as
soon as I get a chance (and -- based on the feedback -- potentially
send-pr it later).
-- Jachym Holecek