Subject: Re: scan_ffs from OpenBSD ported and improved.
To: Roland Illig <>
From: David Laight <>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 06/07/2005 08:12:49
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 06:36:24AM +0200, Roland Illig wrote:
> Simon Burge wrote:
> >I've always thought that "(void)printf(..." was overkill.  In our source
> >tree, a quick grep shows 71520 printf's without void and 2203 with void.
> I hope that in all the non-void cases ferror() is called after printing, 
> but my guess is that it isn't.

You need to check ferror() after fflush(), not fprintf().


David Laight: