Subject: Re: is vi(1)'s autoindent the right default behaviour?
To: Luke Mewburn <lukem@NetBSD.org>
From: Igor Sobrado <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 05/09/2005 10:14:27
Hi Greg and Luke!
I was not sure about the right behaviour for vi(1). I guess I am too
used to xclipboard(1) --- by the way, both xclipboard(1) and xmh(1) are
a broken since XFree86 4.x, I hope these commands will be fixed in
the future, but it is not a task for the NetBSD developers, though.
> I find it quicker to do:
> :r! cat /dev/tty
> [paste here]
> than to toggle ai (autoindent) off & on.
"set ai" and "set noai" require typing few characters!
":r! cat /dev/tty"... 16 characters (+changing to "command mode") and
two additional characters for ^D. "set ai" + "set noai"... 6+8 characters
and changing to command mode two times!
It *cannot* be quicker!
> I think I've even got a macro for that...
Indeed, it will be easier with a macro.
Seriously, thanks a lot for the feedback. I asked this question because
I was not sure about the right behaviour for vi(1).
I agree with Greg about the advantages of a syntax driven auto-indent.
But most of us do not want a 50 MB vi(1) on NetBSD, right? :-)