On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 05:59:19PM +0200, Jaromir Dolecek wrote:
> While we are at it, please rename the PF-specific spamd to pf-spamd or
> similar.

I can see what name clash you are trying to avoid here, but note that this
spamd should not be pf specific (it should be easy to extend it to support
ipf). So maybe do not make the name too pf centric.

Martin