-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:

>On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 02:00:13AM +0200, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
>> On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Luke Mewburn wrote:
>> >Peter asked core about this.  Core approved it, based on similar
>> >rationale for the decision core made about new "system" users.
>> 
>> Thanks for speaking up as core@.
>> 
>> Can you please outline what the rationale is, and about what other 
>> "system" users it is? Questions I see here are:
>
>This was discussed at *exhaustive* length about a year ago.  Maybe the
>discussion in the archive would be helpful?

Um, no.  It was discussed inconclusively six months ago.  The link to 
the thread in the archives has already been posted in this thread, and 
most of us have gone back and re-read the thread to make sure our 
memories of its inconclusiveness hold.

That said, we all seem to be doing a better job of reaching a conclusion 
this time.  I'm certainly content at this point.

- -- 
				Jim Wise
				jwise@draga.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFCVU2vpRpI6SYACmIRAh6WAJ4/gkRjnbPYadruyWD48bk5E5ifSgCgtsjf
hjgdHTjIxJLyBKVb6BzHqfg=
=mQCh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----