Subject: Re: replacement for bc(1), dc(1), diff(1), and diff(3)
To: Christos Zoulas <email@example.com>
From: Phil Nelson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 03/26/2005 22:37:15
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Friday 25 March 2005 14:42, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> Phil, you said that you would dual-license bc, and import that... This was
> a while ago. What happened?
Yes, I did say that. I also have not done all the work needed to do that. =
also have not taken the time to coordinate a dual distribution with the FSF=
I'm not sure how much that will take.
On another front, someone said I shouldn't feel pressured to change the=20
license. I have felt some pressure since people continue to suggest=20
replacement on the basis other than a technically superior product or even
a technically equivalent product with a better license.
I still may do this, but it won't happen until the summer at the earliest.
Phil Nelson NetBSD: http://www.netbsd.org
e-mail: email@example.com Coda: http://www.coda.cs.cmu.edu
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)
=2D----END PGP SIGNATURE-----