Subject: Re: rc.d: time synchronization issues at boot time
To: Simon J. Gerraty <email@example.com>
From: Simon Burge <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 03/16/2005 12:28:46
Simon J. Gerraty wrote:
> >Currently there is no explicit dependency ordering between
> >ntpdate and named, and the order in which they start is
> >non-determanistic, although generally it seems that named
> >is started before ntpdate.
> I think it more likely that ntpdate depends on named than the
> other way around.
Especially since our default ntp.conf lists names that need to be
Simon Burge <email@example.com>
NetBSD Support and Service: http://www.wasabisystems.com/