Simon J. Gerraty wrote:

> >Currently there is no explicit dependency ordering between
> >ntpdate and named, and the order in which they start is
> >non-determanistic, although generally it seems that named
> >is started before ntpdate.
> 
> I think it more likely that ntpdate depends on named than the 
> other way around.

Especially since our default ntp.conf lists names that need to be
resolved:

	server          0.pool.ntp.org
	server          1.pool.ntp.org
	server          2.pool.ntp.org

Simmon.
--
Simon Burge                            <simonb@wasabisystems.com>
NetBSD Support and Service:         http://www.wasabisystems.com/