Subject: Re: rc.d: time synchronization issues at boot time
To: Luke Mewburn <>
From: Simon J. Gerraty <>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 03/15/2005 09:23:38
>Currently there is no explicit dependency ordering between
>ntpdate and named, and the order in which they start is
>non-determanistic, although generally it seems that named
>is started before ntpdate.

I think it more likely that ntpdate depends on named than the 
other way around.