Subject: Re: static vs. dynamic runtime linking, again (was: PAM and su -K)
To: None <tech-userlevel@netbsd.org>
From: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 01/25/2005 12:29:27
>> The way it is implemented in 2.0 is rather broken, even if only in
>> the way it defaults things.
> And 2.0 is different how?  Nothing has changed in this regard since,
> what, 1.5 (which was an ELF release on several platforms, right?)

I think so.  But I didn't say 2.0 was *newly* broken in this regard.
It's quite possible the brokenness has been there since 1.5.  (Indeed,
looking at my cc wrapper, I suspect it's been there ever since ELF,
though my point about "if I were a new user" still stands - I can't see
where new users are supposed to find -R, much less -Wl,-rpath.)

/~\ The ASCII				der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML	       mouse@rodents.montreal.qc.ca
/ \ Email!	     7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B