--Apple-Mail-6--724748575
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed


On Jan 22, 2005, at 1:43 PM, Greywolf wrote:

> Well, slap me silly, then!  Since this IS NetBSD we're talking about,
> right?, this could very well be the first correct implementation of 
> PAM.

Uh, as has been mentioned already, LinuxPAM has support for static 
modules in libpam.a, as does the stock OpenPAM (OpenPAM is what we are 
using in NetBSD).

Of course, "correct" in this case is a matter of your own opinion.  A 
system that does not claim to support statically-linked binaries does 
not have an "incorrect" PAM implementation if they do not have static 
module support in their libpam.a.

Personally, I would like to see us do away with this statically-linked 
binary nonsense altogether.

         -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@shagadelic.org>


--Apple-Mail-6--724748575
content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453;
	name=PGP.sig
content-description: This is a digitally signed message part
content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig
content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFB8s3uOpVKkaBm8XkRAgJcAJ4ytvn+TitDq2Derx6J7Bl5v1l5XwCdHQJC
iykO65lXi2pMTIP9QGoOPRs=
=bX3D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail-6--724748575--