Subject: Re: PAM and su -K
To: Roland Dowdeswell <elric@imrryr.org>
From: Emmanuel Dreyfus <manu@netbsd.org>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 01/16/2005 22:55:37
Roland Dowdeswell <elric@imrryr.org> wrote:

> No.  We probably have to do away with the -K flag and accept that
> although PAM provides a number of advantages---there are disadvantages
> too.

Note that if we go the "su-nokerberos" way, supporting su -K means a 3
lines diff in su_pam.c and adding a /etc/pam.d/su-nokerbros config file.
That's a really easy one.

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
manu@netbsd.org