Subject: Re: Compiling the system with different options.
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Christos Zoulas <email@example.com>
Date: 11/16/2004 00:29:47
In article <20041116001946.GQ7801@mewburn.net>,
Luke Mewburn <lukem@NetBSD.org> wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 05:49:12PM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> | There was a recent PR mentioning that right now there are too many options
> | hard-coded in the Makefiles and we cannot easily turn them on and off.
> | The example in the PR was -DINET6, but there are many more.
>INET6 is one of the few remaining ones to fix AFAICT.
Probably, but the approach of having to add an if statement to ~100
Makefiles is not appealing. I also think that the approach of
short-circuiting the subdirectory traversal depending on the options
is not great. I would rather have make descend in all the directories
and do nothing. (Think about make clean)...