> Just to be clear here (sorry no coffee). I meant that we should leave
> the prototype the way it is now:
> 
> size_t  iconv           __P((iconv_t, char ** __restrict,
>                              size_t * __restrict, char ** __restrict,
>                              size_t * __restrict));
> 
> add the reasoning in the bugs section, and ask Klaus to discuss changing
> it to const char **restrict in the POSIX committee meetings.

Oops, I reverted them... we should not touch them any more before
the conclusion of the POSIX committee meetings, should we?

--
Takuya SHIOZAKI