Subject: Re: iconv(3) prototype
To: None <email@example.com>
From: T.SHIOZAKI <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 08/02/2004 23:09:40
> Just to be clear here (sorry no coffee). I meant that we should leave
> the prototype the way it is now:
> size_t iconv __P((iconv_t, char ** __restrict,
> size_t * __restrict, char ** __restrict,
> size_t * __restrict));
> add the reasoning in the bugs section, and ask Klaus to discuss changing
> it to const char **restrict in the POSIX committee meetings.
Oops, I reverted them... we should not touch them any more before
the conclusion of the POSIX committee meetings, should we?