Subject: Re: iconv(3) prototype
From: Christos Zoulas <>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 08/02/2004 07:58:30
On Aug 2,  6:44pm, ("T.SHIOZAKI") wrote:
-- Subject: Re: iconv(3) prototype

| > | So, I will change it, ok?
| > 
| > I guess; but it looks like ours is semantically more correct.
| I am sorry, I missed this mail.  Should I revert the changes?
| Or, I guess there is the way that I will leave the change,
| and add the mention about the weirdness of the POSIX specification
| to the BUGS section of iconv(3).

Yes, reverting it was good. Send mail to klaus klein so he can fight
it in the committees, and add it as a bug in iconv(3)...