Subject: Re: __UNCONST(a)
To: None <tech-userlevel@NetBSD.org>
From: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
Date: 07/04/2004 02:22:09
>> If I had to use a __DECONST like that, I would almost certainly wrap
>> a DECONST() around it that simply provided void * as the type.
> Then you don't need __DECONST, do you? Wouldn't '(void*)' do just as
No, because I use -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings.
And from a pragmatic point of view, it's been a right choice for me;
the warnings I get are worth more than the hassle they occasionally
require cost me.
/~\ The ASCII der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML firstname.lastname@example.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B