Subject: Re: src/etc imports for PF
To: Luke Mewburn <lukem@NetBSD.org>
From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/29/2004 16:58:39
as my doctor told me to stay away from discussions in american project,
this is the last message from me on the topic.
> | > Hi Itojun.
> | >
> | > For consistency with the way that we're moving to maintain other
> | > third party software in our tree, could you please:
> | question: consistency with what? is there any written description,
> | or is it your personal preference/rule? i don't see any prior art on
> | this "consistency" thing, so i have no motivation/justification to
> | follow your recommendation. anyways, here are my comments. i won't
> | bother to commit/re-import.
>Consistency with at least the following 3rd party products:
>That is _significant_ prior art in our tree for this type of software.
well, if you take a quick look, bind, ntp, postfix and sendmail clearly
does not suit your recommendation. they have files installed into
/etc by default.