Subject: Re: TCFS userlevel source organization question
To: Perry E. Metzger <email@example.com>
From: VaX#n8 <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/18/2004 00:23:14
>Since TCFS isn't vendor software, but is rather a subsystem VaX#n8 has
>built specifically for NetBSD, I don't think dist/ is correct in this
Well, I didn't write the first revision but it's total abandonware.
I expect no updates. Ever.
From my cursory examination it will involve a lot of re-writing.
It seems conceivable that someone might want /usr to be a TCFS file system;
should the userland tools go in /usr/src/bin or /usr/src/usr.bin, or the
sbin variants? What's the criteria involved in this decision?