Subject: Re: closefrom()
To: Matt Thomas <email@example.com>
From: mouss <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 05/28/2004 19:38:00
Matt Thomas wrote:
> At 02:48 PM 5/26/2004, mouss wrote:
> stdlib.h includes non O/S specific interfaces (malloc, free, getopt).
> closefrom is definitely O/S specific (Unix-Like), so it doesn't
> belong there.
sure, but stdlib.h contains functions like ttyslot(), getloadavg(),
daemon(), setproctitle(), while unistd.h includes crypt() and swab().
or are these just exceptions to confirm the rule?
Besides, I prefer a situation where all OSes use the same wrong file,
than using the right one when others don't. As goes the saying:
"There are fewer inconveniences in being a fool with the fools than in
being wise all alone."
> It's easy to look back and say header files are dumb. But that was 30
> (or 15 depending on your view) years and the computing world was very
> very different. Hindsight is easy, foresight is not.
yes but: conservatism is easy, progress is not ;-p
... and vice versa of course. it all depends on the context.
But yes, "Criticism is easy, art is difficult."
Anyway, I wasn't after what happened at the beginning but after what has
_not_ happened afterwards. (I do respect both the original contributors
and their successors, but I think they deserve a better respect: if the
work is improved, people will be more grateful to the original creators
and their successors).
More precisely, I am concerned about things like:
- if HAVE_MALLOC_H, if <foo is in thisheader>, ... obfuscating thousands
of source code.
- include <pthreads.h> (or curses.h, or any file for which multiple
implementations exist) and have a hard time figuring out whether it's
the one in /usr/include or /usr/pkg/include (or /usr/local/include,
/opt/.., ... depending on where you put your hands).
- the difficulty of automatic dependencies mgmt with regard to header files.
- and possibly other things I don't remember (which may of course be
> I strong disagree. <unistd.h> is a better choice since that's where
> open/close/dup live.
then go for unistd.h. After all, compat with openbsd is more important
than with solaris.
and heh: putting it in the right header "is a detail, but details make
perfection, and perfection isn't a detail" :-)
(I hope you like this one).