Subject: Re: closefrom()
To: Klaus Klein (by way of Klaus Klein ) <email@example.com>
From: mouss <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 05/26/2004 23:48:03
Klaus Klein (by way of Klaus Klein <email@example.com>) wrote:
> I agree. However, what's the rationale behind its declaration
> having ended up in <stdlib.h>? I won't contend that Solaris'
> is prior art, but since <stdlib.h> rarely concerns itself with
> file descriptor management, OpenBSD's in <unistd.h> seems a
> more natural choice of placement to me, but it's also unnecessarily
both unistd and stdlib have their history of portability issues, and
none seems better from a "rational" viewpoint. so the winner is the
first that had it... the argument stating that stdlib is std and should
be reserved to std c has history against it...
Now, whether it goes to unistd, stdlib, newstandard.h or
hasta_siempre_la_revolution.h is a secondary question. The header files
mechanism is one the (archaic?) C "features" that causes too many
problems and should deserve very little time.
so go add it. just put the declaration in any header file you feel good.