On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 04:51:25PM +0200, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> On Tue, 25 May 2004, Klaus Heinz wrote:
> > Is the appended patch acceptable?
> 
> What does SUSv3 (etc.) say that unset should do?

Also 'unset -e' is definitely an NewtBSD'ism, and could be deliberately
undocumented.
(I added it in order to 'unexport' $PS1 so I could tell which shell
I was running.)

If documented, it ought to be marked as non-standard.

	David

-- 
David Laight: david@l8s.co.uk