Subject: Re: /etc/rc.d/virecover
To: Andrew Brown <email@example.com>
From: Luke Mewburn <lukem@NetBSD.org>
Date: 01/22/2004 14:45:06
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 10:41:46PM -0500, Andrew Brown wrote:
| fwiw, i think virecover should be run from daily, not from rc.d (or
| maybe both). some people may not reboot all that much and they're
| missing them, whereas those people that reboot a lot may end up being
| inundated by reports they ignore.
| it should also use some sort of heuristic like "hmm...this recover.foo
| file was last accessed less than a week ago, so i'll assume i read it
| when sending it out, and not resend it again just yet".
someone around here was allegedly working on /etc/periodic.d ...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----