Subject: Re: /etc/rc.d/virecover
To: Greywolf <email@example.com>
From: Andrew Brown <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 01/21/2004 22:41:46
>"virecover" should be "YES", IMO.
i prefer "no" because i reboot a lot and the mail is a waste, but then
again, i can set it to no on my machine and be done with it.
fwiw, i think virecover should be run from daily, not from rc.d (or
maybe both). some people may not reboot all that much and they're
missing them, whereas those people that reboot a lot may end up being
inundated by reports they ignore.
it should also use some sort of heuristic like "hmm...this recover.foo
file was last accessed less than a week ago, so i'll assume i read it
when sending it out, and not resend it again just yet".
|-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----|
email@example.com * "ah! i see you have the internet
firstname.lastname@example.org (Andrew Brown) that goes *ping*!"
email@example.com * "information is power -- share the wealth."