Subject: Re: Progress meter for fsck, revisited
To: NetBSD Userlevel Technical Discussion List <tech-userlevel@NetBSD.org>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <ignatios@theory.cs.uni-bonn.de>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 01/14/2004 09:29:54
--Pd0ReVV5GZGQvF3a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 12:25:09AM -0500, Nathan J. Williams wrote:
> Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@NetBSD.org> writes:
>=20
> > Well, I disagree. I think it's a cool thing to have in the tree, and it=
=20
> > can benefit a number of users. Also, it is an option, after all.
>=20
> "A number". How many?

Nearly every PC desktop or laptop user out there. Nearly every HPC
user out there.

Yes, it's bad for multidisk server configurations, or for the two-disk
Amiga (or other machine) users. But as I understand, if they don't enable
it, they aren't penalized, right?

Regards,
	-is

--Pd0ReVV5GZGQvF3a
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.i

iQEVAgUBQAT+ADCn4om+4LhpAQHmDAf/UiazrgzqFi6lMv5OUcCGneMx0F+mTLnK
YJh4xcQNgDhKXL+MIPtMQQNmPaikBv4cmuBrL1h/teXP3G3x3bCeO0VftRXV3bnA
nl1CHM3bwZ5pYhvRvk17iB9VPPdGYMpj9qU2DshVYf/Jn525qzkxZcgTapJqtKyv
+U/0uwqpVLYI74an+NIzYApwcfw/giD2T2p0DUmNQl4Q3DtKO0a7O9PN1EKF25hD
COkgW8U15WOaRIyxjh9MD3R+Lgs2QHqVf00tcM0TzVDRSOZdz31GEoNekI2Bkxk6
MnxdP6//fLsnI+y8FoQ5uZg76BiP5XlmtBALEGnxVvBrb3yuF+PhIA==
=3RzY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Pd0ReVV5GZGQvF3a--