Subject: Re: Policy questions
To: Gavan Fantom <email@example.com>
From: Sean Davis <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 01/04/2004 10:50:06
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 02:48:14PM +0000, Gavan Fantom wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Jan 2004, Sean Davis wrote:
> > If the network is safe enough for rsh, it's probably safe enough to jus=
> > X over tcp without forwarding it through anything.
> This is a pain when you have to start messing with xhost and setting
> DISPLAY correctly, especially if you're not on :0.0.
Agreed, but tunneling X when you already trust your network, even if it is
more convienent, does nothing but add more overhead to the X connections.
My point was that there really isn't much use for X-over-ssh on a
trusted(-enough) network. The advantage you point out is about the only one
I can think of, and I don't think it outweighs the protocol overhead of
running X through ssh.
/~\ The ASCII
\ / Ribbon Campaign Sean Davis
X Against HTML aka dive
/ \ Email!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----