Subject: Re: Policy questions
To: John Hawkinson <jhawk@MIT.EDU>
From: Greywolf <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 01/02/2004 11:19:38
Thus spake John Hawkinson ("JH> ") sometime Today...
JH> Well, no. The issue that I raised is that we ought to have a tool to
JH> allow unencrypted file transfers without allowing unencrypted logins,
JH> and that netcat was the only tool I knew of that usefully allowed it.
JH> If there are other tools in common usage, I'd like to know what they
To restate it simply:
- rsh requires "preauthentication" to work; i.e. it will not prompt for a
password if one is required. It just bails at that point.
- ssh has too much overhead in the encryption and does not provide,
by default, an unencrypted data channel.
- we need a new remote-access utility which will provide zero data encryption
by default, while requiring true user authentication.
Did I miss anything?
Solaris 2 is not an upgrade from Solaris 1. They just want you to THINK it is.