Subject: Re: RelCache vs. Red Hat prelink
To: Bang Jun-Young <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Hubert Feyrer <email@example.com>
Date: 01/02/2004 01:25:28
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003, Bang Jun-Young wrote:
> RelCache used to work fine for all programs I tested until binutils
> were upgraded to 2.14. For Prelink, it was quite complicated and slower
> than RelCache (in theory), I didn't feel the need to port it to NetBSD. :-)
> Obviously, there's still much room for improvements. If you're interested,
> I'll provide you with code and patches for -current.
Um, I just wondered about the overall state, I won't be able to maintain
your code. If it's working, pkgsrc may be a good place to make it
___ _ _ _ _ * Harddisk Image Cloning *
/ __| | || | | | www.feyrer.de/g4u/
| (_ |_ _| |_| |
\___| |_| \___/ v1.12 out now, including partition support!