Subject: Re: RelCache vs. Red Hat prelink
To: Hubert Feyrer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Bang Jun-Young <email@example.com>
Date: 12/31/2003 13:28:27
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 04:05:47AM +0100, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> I found your posting abour a comparison. Did you get either of the
> programs working on NetBSD?
RelCache used to work fine for all programs I tested until binutils
were upgraded to 2.14. For Prelink, it was quite complicated and slower
than RelCache (in theory), I didn't feel the need to port it to NetBSD. :-)
Obviously, there's still much room for improvements. If you're interested,
I'll provide you with code and patches for -current.
Bang Jun-Young <junyoung@NetBSD.org>