Subject: Re: Humanization of ls(1)
To: Hubert Feyrer <email@example.com>
From: David P. Reese Jr. <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/29/2003 03:31:05
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 05:42:38AM +0100, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, David P. Reese Jr. wrote:
> > > > SUSv3 says that '-s' is non portable and may be removed from the standard
> > > > in the future. I'm not very excited about reading file sizes in gigablocks.
> > >
> > > "-s" is already in NetBSD. The question is how "-h" interacts with it.
> > I am talking about '-s' and '-h' interaction. SUSv3 says that '-s' is non
> > portable due to differences in block sizes. Thus I don't feel too bad if
> > '-h' radically effects the behavior of '-s'.
> What SUSv3 say about -h?
It says nothing about '-h' with respect to ls(1).
David P. Reese, Jr. daver at gomerbud.com