Subject: Re: make -j and failure modes
To: Ben Harris <bjh21@NetBSD.org>
From: Greywolf <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/10/2003 13:40:04
Thus spake Ben Harris ("BH> ") sometime Today...
BH> Before I bother composing a substantive reply, can I just check whether
BH> you're arguing that the AT&T ksh behaviour is POSIX conformant, or
BH> that NetBSD should ignore POSIX and follow AT&T ksh? If the latter, I
BH> shall just shrug and ignore you.
No, I was NOT suggesting that we should (blindly) ignore POSIX on this
issue, nor was I suggesting that we (blindly) follow AT&T ksh. I was
merely reporting on shell behaviour I have witnessed since my "birth"
Am I understanding from your inference, then, that POSIX has changed
the behaviour of -e as applied to () at some point? If that's the case,
then I don't know of a single vendor with a POSIX compliant shell. If
we're POSIX-compliant, I'll shut up, but I'll add that most people who
use make have made assumptions about sh's "old" behaviour while writing
Shrug and ignore, if you must. I'm not looking for a war, I'm just
making some observations.
NetBSD: We Come In Peace.