Subject: Re: randomid(3)
From: David Laight <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 09/10/2003 19:28:57
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 11:15:49AM -0700, Simon J. Gerraty wrote:
> Robert Elz wrote:
> >client at just the right time. This libc really good random ID stuff
> >makes no difference to anything at all that matters for DNS queries - it
> >simply adds overhead.
> And serious overhead at that. The suggestion to use this new random
> id thing for DNS queries raised a red-flag for me when I saw it,
> but I couldn't follow-up at the time. I agree with Robert that this
> is likely excessive overhead for the benefit it may provide to DNS
> clients (in the real world).
Note that the libc version is doing a lot of 64bit divides and a
system call for every number....
The 'fast modular exponentiation' routine isn't particularly fast!
That function can easily be written without a single divide (for the
values of 'mod' in that routine).
David Laight: email@example.com