Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/lib/libc/rpc
To: None <>
From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 09/09/2003 16:52:55
> > Might it have been better to put the new __rpc_getxid code and related
> > functions in a separate file?  Putting a new licence near the bottom of
> > a file could lead to some confusion for folks searching the tree for
> > licencing conditions...
> And, if you insist on using it, but it in the source tree once, and
> once only.

	anyone care to comment on API i proposed a couple of days ago?
	(i heard none)  is it ok to add the API (randomid(3), i called) to libc?