Subject: Re: LC040 softfloat build of 1.6.1
To: Christos Zoulas <christos@zoulas.com>
From: Bruce ONeel <edoneel@sdf.lonestar.org>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 08/14/2003 15:49:28
Hi,

This sounds like a good idea.  I'll try to get it working.

cheers

bruce

christos@zoulas.com (Christos Zoulas) wrote:
> In article <0HJG00DMIGZOCQ@mbx.unige.ch>,
> Bruce ONeel <edoneel@sdf.lonestar.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Can't you do a similar trick like we do for i387? I.e. build libm
> by default without the m68881 assembly stuff, and then build a libm68881.so
> and have that selected via /etc/ld.so.conf like i386 and alpha do it?
> Yes you'll still need to build everything with soft-float enabled because
> of the chip bugs, but at least libm will be handled in a sane way.
> I suppose the rest of the softfloat changes to support 80 bit doubles
> can just go in...
> 
> christos
> 
> >Hi,
> >
> >I've gotten 1.6.1 to build with -msoft-float so that it now
> >runs correctly on mac68k LC040s.  This brings a lot of macs
> >into to fold so that they can run NetBSD.
> >
> >All of the files (thanks to John Klos for the bandwidth) live
> >at:
> >ftp://reva.sixgirls.org/pub/NetBSD/m68k/
> >
> >You also can get them from http://edoneel.chaosnet.org/Downloads.html.
> >
> >The 1.6.1 build lives at:
> >ftp://reva.sixgirls.org/pub/NetBSD/m68k/NetBSD-1.6.1-mac-lc040/
> >
> >The file named lc040-softfloat-20030806.tgz holds all of the
> >changes to the 1.6.1 source tree that allow this all to work.
> >The changes are all to the m68k code, none of them really
> >matter what sub arch beyond that.  Ie, it should be the same
> >if someone has say an amiga with a LC040.  That said, this build
> >is for mac68k and I've only tested it there.
> >
> >A few notes:
> >
> >- fpgetround is known to be broken.  It will aways return 0.
> >- The kernels have a slightly changed ams.c so that the PB500
> >trackpad works.
> >- I built the color xserver and it lives in xserver_color.tgz.  You
> >have to hand install this.
> >- The testing is limited.  I'm sending this from a pb540 with a
> >LC040 and everything seems fine.  That does not qualify as 
> >well tested though.
> >
> >Some background for those of you just brought into the conversation:
> >
> >Motorola produced the 68040 which, unlike earlier 68k chips, contained
> >a built in FPU.  They also weren't thinking and produced an LC040,
> >the same chip either with the FPU disabled or not present.  Apple built
> >a lot of systems with the LC040 since from the Apple POV they
> >already did FP emulation with SANE.
> >
> >NetBSD uses a FPemulator which works well on 020 and 030 systems
> >which don't have a separate FPU.  This fp emulator does not work
> >on the LC040 systems.  In some versions, a LC040 will not trap
> >correctly when faced with a F instruction.  In other cases it seems
> >to be possible to get the trap right and then emulate the instruction.
> >In the mac world softfpu seems to manage this.  In neither
> >case does NetBSD work correctly though.  The user symptom is
> >that programs randomly bus error and segfault.  When I poke
> >at it the stack seems messed up.
> >
> >My approach was the following.  Since gcc can generate fpu emulation
> >calls rather than f instructions when presented with the flag 
> >-msoft-float I build all of 1.6.1 with this flag.  Then I fixed some
> >places in libc and libm so that the proper emulation routines were
> >called.
> >
> >The file lc040-softfloat-20030806.tgz  when exploded over top 
> >of a 1.6.1 source tree produces a source tree that if MKSOFTFLOAT
> >is set builds with -msoft-float, else it builds normally.
> >
> >The good part here is that these binaries will work on any 020,
> >030, 040, or lc040 mac.  The bad part is that 020 and 030 macs with
> >external fpus, and full 040 macs will run fp instructions slower.  
> >This is probably most noticable in libm.
> >
> >Next I'm off to do current.  Thanks again to John Klos for 
> >a faast 68060 to build on!
> >
> >cheers
> >
> >bruce