Subject: Re: small getbsize(3) change
To: Luke Mewburn <>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 05/29/2003 12:11:52
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 07:13:49PM +1000, Luke Mewburn wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 02:10:24PM +1000, Simon Burge wrote:
>   | We've got a couple of places in our source tree where we use a dummy
>   | variable just so that getbsize(3) can stuff a value in that is ignored.
>   | The following patch changes getbsize(3) so that if either parameter is
>   | NULL it is ignored.
>   | 
>   | Any problems with this?
> Looks reasonable to me.

To me, too. Thats the way a few other interfaces of that kind behave.
(As long as no standard forbids it...)

seal your e-mail:

Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (NetBSD)