Subject: Re: small getbsize(3) change
To: Luke Mewburn <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <email@example.com>
Date: 05/29/2003 12:11:52
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 07:13:49PM +1000, Luke Mewburn wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 02:10:24PM +1000, Simon Burge wrote:
> | We've got a couple of places in our source tree where we use a dummy
> | variable just so that getbsize(3) can stuff a value in that is ignored.
> | The following patch changes getbsize(3) so that if either parameter is
> | NULL it is ignored.
> | Any problems with this?
> Looks reasonable to me.
To me, too. Thats the way a few other interfaces of that kind behave.
(As long as no standard forbids it...)
seal your e-mail: http://www.gnupg.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----