Subject: Re: Symbol lookups.
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Andrew Brown <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 05/09/2003 09:02:08
>> > As a result of this, I think there may be a reason to remove the
>> > kvm database alltogether, especially because it would need a bunch
>> > of extra massage anyway to update it if modules are loaded/unloaded;
>> > and fall back to the old "nlist" way of retreiving kernel symbols
>> > if /dev/ksyms is not in the kernel?
>> I think this is a great idea. It would allow us to remove a bunch of
>> code, as well.
>Yes, that is a nice side-effect of it.
>Ok, nobody seems to have any special objections, so I will change the
>kvm/nlist routines to use the /dev/ksyms interface instead, and retire
>the old kvm.db stuff.
even thought it had the nice side effect of providing a simple single
place to look for kernel symbols? perhaps kvm_mkdb should be changed
to something that copies the kernel to a known place? /dev/ksyms is
still an option...
|-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----|
email@example.com * "ah! i see you have the internet
firstname.lastname@example.org (Andrew Brown) that goes *ping*!"
email@example.com * "information is power -- share the wealth."