Subject: Re: why not "make includes" before "make do-tools" for build.sh?
To: None <tech-userlevel@NetBSD.ORG (NetBSD Userlevel Technical Discussion\>
From: Simon Burge <email@example.com>
Date: 05/09/2003 09:53:55
"Greg A. Woods" wrote:
> You also seem to have forgot that there's a critically important
> document, UPDATING, which people tracking the trunk must read if they
> expect to have above average success in their builds. It will, or at
> least is supposed to, tell people when changes have been made that will
> cause "build -u" to fail.
BUILDING has this to say:
Note: This document applies only to platforms which use the new toolchain
as indicated by the default setting of TOOLCHAIN_MISSING in <bsd.own.mk>.
Platforms which have not yet been switched to the new toolchain should
continue building traditionally, using the notes specified in the file
In a nutshell, you use build.sh _or_ UPDATING (with build.sh the much
more preferred method). Maybe some wording should be cleared up to make
this more explicit.
Simon Burge <firstname.lastname@example.org>
NetBSD Support and Service: http://www.wasabisystems.com/