Subject: Re: why not "make includes" before "make do-tools" for build.sh?
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Geoff Wing <email@example.com>
Date: 05/08/2003 01:39:46
Andrew Brown <firstname.lastname@example.org> typed:
:>Why not do "make includes" before "make do-tools" for build.sh?
: that strikes me as a bad idea, since you could then end up with
: include files that reference functions that aren't implemented in libc
: yet, for example: __unsetenv13, __sigaction14, ...
That is exactly the reason I was given when I made a similar query
when the toolchain build system was introduced :-) Your tools need to
build with a matching set of includes & libs.
Geoff Wing : <email@example.com>
Rxvt Stuff : <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Zsh Stuff : <email@example.com>