Subject: Re: script command
To: Greywolf <email@example.com>
From: Jaromir Dolecek <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 05/01/2003 21:29:30
> DL> > By comparison with Solaris, our sh is broken, btw: Solaris behaves
> DL> > as expected.
> DL> in what way do you mean 'expected' ?
> Historically, sh -c "command args" has been required. For it to have changed
> is most unexpected, but this is to be expected from POS-ix.
Yes, sh -c 'command args' should always execute 'command' with
arguments 'args'. Any shell not doing that is broken and needs to be
Jaromir Dolecek <jdolecek@NetBSD.org> http://www.NetBSD.org/
-=- We should be mindful of the potential goal, but as the tantric -=-
-=- Buddhist masters say, ``You may notice during meditation that you -=-
-=- sometimes levitate or glow. Do not let this distract you.'' -=-