Subject: Re: New options to wsconscfg(8) and wsfontload(8) for uwscons
To: Noriyuki Soda <email@example.com>
From: Bang Jun-Young <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 04/12/2003 00:57:26
On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 12:27:38AM +0900, Noriyuki Soda wrote:
> >>>>> On Sat, 12 Apr 2003 00:17:05 +0900,
> Bang Jun-Young <email@example.com> said:
> > # name width height fstchar enc file
> > font latin1 8 16 - ISO-8859-1 /usr/share/wscons/fonts/iso.816
> Mm, "ISO-8859-1"?
> I think it should be "ISO8859-1", because "ISO8859-1" is the value
> that our nl_langinfo(CODESET) returns.
It was a typo. :)
> > After this change, encodings `iso' and `iso7' will be no longer
> > valid. Is it okay? (Of course, I won't bring it into -current until
> > I have committed the kernel part of uwscons first.)
> I'm not sure.
> If compatibility is needed, we can hardcode compat stuff in wsconscfg.c.
With addition of `fstchar' field in the font line, the old wsconscfg(8)
will no longer accept the new syntax. So compatibility must be sacrified.
Bang Jun-Young <firstname.lastname@example.org>