Subject: Re: lpwrapper
To: Julio Merino <email@example.com>
From: Greg A. Woods <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 03/20/2003 13:32:22
[ On Thursday, March 20, 2003 at 16:09:44 (+0100), Julio Merino wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: lpwrapper
> Sure? There are lots of programs that execute the 'lpr' binary to print
> things. So if they use the one in /usr/bin, cups won't get noticed about
> the new job.
Speaking of piling bad hacks on more bad hacks: can't you configure
CUPS to accept LPR jobs and if so then you can easily configure
/etc/printcap with a single default remote printer that forwards to CUPS
running on the loopback or on an alias IP# or some such.
> > CUPS is an ugly hack. The whole notion of parsing the content of the
> > print job to determine how to handle it is fundamentally flawed.
Indeed CUPS really truely is most gross and ugly and bloated.
> How is this related to what I'm proposing?
Don't use CUPS! ;-)
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 218-0098; <email@example.com>; <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Planix, Inc. <email@example.com>; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird <firstname.lastname@example.org>