On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 04:43:49PM +0100, Quentin Garnier wrote:
> Le Sun, 16 Mar 2003 10:50:28 -0800
> Soren Jacobsen a écrit :
> > On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 02:42:45PM +0100, cube wrote:
> > > I wonder if !prog or +hostname are worth implementing too.
> > 
> > I think those would be very valuable.
> 
> For some reason, I find this hack quite ugly. It works to keep
> configuration file compatibility, but I'd prefer something like :
> 
> program@host:facility.priority
> 
> as a selector, which would break compatibility.

I merely meant the functionality. I think your proposed syntax would
indeed be better.

-- 
Soren Jacobsen