On Mar 5,  2:37pm, hubert.feyrer@informatik.fh-regensburg.de (Hubert Feyrer) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: sorting ps output

| On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Christos Zoulas wrote:
| > t for thread sounds better to me than the current s. Choosing t, will free s
| > for sort.
| 
| -k is still free too, and it's compatible with sort(1).

This is even better! Thanks for pointing it out.