On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> t for thread sounds better to me than the current s. Choosing t, will free s
> for sort.

-k is still free too, and it's compatible with sort(1).


 - Hubert

-- 
Want to get a clue on IPv6 but don't know where to start? Try this:
* Basics -> http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2001/05/24/ipv6_tutorial.html
* Setup  -> http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2001/06/01/ipv6_tutorial.html
Of course with your #1 IPv6 ready operating system -> http://www.NetBSD.org/